> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 10:54 AM
> To: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Kahola, Mika <mika.kah...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be 
> transmitted one frame earlier
> 
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 08:40:52AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 11:32 +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > Display driver shall read DPCD 00071h[3:1] during configuration to
> > > get PSR setup time. This register provides the setup time
> > > requirement on the VSC SDP entry packet. If setup time cannot be met
> > > with the current timings (e.g., PSR setup time + other blanking
> > > requirements > blanking time), driver should enable sending VSC SDP
> > > one frame earlier before sending the capture frame.
> > >
> > > BSpec: 69895 (PSR Entry Setup Frames 17:16)
> > >
> > > v2: Write frames before su entry to correct register (Ville, Jouni)
> > >     Move frames before su entry calculation to it's
> > >     own function (Ville, Jouni)
> > >     Rename PSR Entry Setup Frames register to indicate
> > >     Lunarlake specificity (Jouni)
> > > v3: Modify setup entry frames calculation function to
> > >     return the actual frames (Ville)
> > >     Match comment with actual implementation (Jouni)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 82
> > > +++++++++++++++--
> > > --
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h |  2 +
> > >  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > index 047fe3f8905a..92f06d67fd1e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > @@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> > >         u32 dc3co_exitline;
> > >         u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
> > >         struct delayed_work dc3co_work;
> > > +       u8 entry_setup_frames;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  struct intel_dp {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > index ecd24a0b86cb..497e4c26f4a6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct
> > > intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >         if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > >                 dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_SU_REGION_SCANLINE_CAPTURE;
> > >
> > > +       if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames > 0)
> > > +               dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE;
> > > +
> > >         drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
> > >
> > >         drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> > > DP_SET_POWER_D0); @@ -690,6 +693,9 @@ static void
> > > hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > >                 val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> > >
> > > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
> > > +               val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames);
> > > +
> > >         intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder),
> > >                      ~EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK, val);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -727,11 +733,27 @@ static int psr2_block_count(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >         return psr2_block_count_lines(intel_dp) / 4;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static u8 get_frames_before_su_entry(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
> > > +       u8 frames_before_su_entry;
> > > +
> > > +       frames_before_su_entry = max_t(u8,
> > > +                                      intel_dp-
> > > >psr.sink_sync_latency + 1,
> > > +                                      2);
> > > +
> > > +       /* Entry setup frames must be at least 1 less than frames
> > > before SU entry */
> > > +       if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames >=
> > > frames_before_su_entry)
> > > +               frames_before_su_entry = intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames + 1;
> > > +
> > > +       return frames_before_su_entry; }
> > > +
> > >  static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >  {
> > >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > >         enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> > >         u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> > > +       u32 psr_val = 0;
> > >
> > >         val |=
> > > EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
> > >
> > > @@ -741,7 +763,8 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) <=
> > > 12)
> > >                 val |= EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE;
> > >
> > > -       val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(max_t(u8, intel_dp-
> > > >psr.sink_sync_latency + 1, 2));
> > > +       val |=
> > > EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(get_frames_before_su_entry(intel_dp));
> > > +
> > >         val |= intel_psr2_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
> > >
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { @@ -785,6 +808,9 @@
> > > static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >         if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > >                 val |= EDP_PSR2_SU_SDP_SCANLINE;
> > >
> > > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
> > > +               psr_val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp-
> > > >psr.entry_setup_frames);
> > > +
> > >         if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled) {
> > >                 u32 tmp;
> > >
> > > @@ -798,7 +824,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >          * PSR2 HW is incorrectly using EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL and
> > > BSpec is
> > >          * recommending keep this bit unset while PSR2 is enabled.
> > >          */
> > > -       intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder), 0);
> > > +       intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > > cpu_transcoder), psr_val);
> > >
> > >         intel_de_write(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder), val);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1066,6 +1092,40 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >         return true;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static u8 intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > +                                          const struct
> > > drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> >
> > I think "set" is not correct here. intel_psr_get_entry_setup_frames is
> > more appropriate.
> 
> I don't really like either.
> 
> We don't generally say eg. get_sin(x) either, it's just sin(x).
> 
> So IMO the correct name would be just intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(), or 
> perhaps intel_psr_num_entry_setup_frames(). That
> will make the code more like proper English when you read it outloud.
I was thinking while writing this that we set the register with this value but 
since we don't actually set the register here the naming would be better 
phrased.

> 
> >
> > > +{
> > > +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >
> > You should use name i915 here.
> >
> > > +       int psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp-
> > > >psr_dpcd);
> > > +       u8 entry_setup_frames = 0;
> > > +
> > > +       if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> > > +               drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                           "PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup
> > > time (0x%02x)\n",
> > > +                           intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
> > > +               return -ETIME;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +       if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time)
> > > +>
> > > +           adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal -
> > > +adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay
> > > - 1) {
> > > +               if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20) {
> > > +                       /* setup entry frames can be set up to 3
> > > frames */
> > > +                       entry_setup_frames = 1;
> > > +                       drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                                   "PSR setup entry frames set to
> > > %d\n",
> > > +                                   entry_setup_frames);
> >
> > Don't refer "setting" here as this is just returning the value. Not
> > setting it.
> 
> This kind of stuff should really all be moved to the crtc state proper, and 
> then just dumped alongside everything else.
Probably this is not the optimal place for this and could be moved out. Maybe 
update to this patch?

Thanks!

-Mika-
> 
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jouni Högander
> >
> > > +               } else {
> > > +                       drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > +                                   "PSR condition failed: PSR setup
> > > time (%d us) too long\n",
> > > +                                   psr_setup_time);
> > > +                       return -ETIME;
> > > +               }
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return entry_setup_frames;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >                                     struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *crtc_state)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1213,7 +1273,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > >         const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> > >                 &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> > > -       int psr_setup_time;
> > > +       u8 entry_setup_frames;
> > >
> > >         /*
> > >          * Current PSR panels don't work reliably with VRR enabled
> > > @@ -1242,19 +1302,13 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >                 return;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
> > > -       if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> > > -               drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > -                           "PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup
> > > time (0x%02x)\n",
> > > -                           intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
> > > -               return;
> > > -       }
> > > +       entry_setup_frames =
> > > intel_psr_set_entry_setup_frames(intel_dp, adjusted_mode);
> > >
> > > -       if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time)
> > > >
> > > -           adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal -
> > > adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay
> > > - 1) {
> > > +       if (entry_setup_frames >= 0) {
> > > +               intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames =
> > > entry_setup_frames;
> > > +       } else {
> > >                 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > -                           "PSR condition failed: PSR setup time
> > > (%d
> > > us) too long\n",
> > > -                           psr_setup_time);
> > > +                           "PSR condition failed: PSR setup timing
> > > not met\n");
> > >                 return;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > index d39951383c92..efe4306b37e0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > >  #define
> > > EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_0_LINES
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ ENTRY_TIME_MASK, 3)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK          REG_GENMASK(24, 20)
> > >  #define
> > > EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME(x)
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP _TIME_MASK, (x))
> > > +#define   LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES_MASK  REG_GENMASK(17, 16)
> > > +#define
> > > LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(x)
> > > REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY _SETUP_FRAMES_MASK, (x))
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT                        REG_BIT(12)
> > >  #define   EDP_PSR_TP_MASK                      REG_BIT(11)
> > >  #define
> > > EDP_PSR_TP_TP1_TP2                   REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR_TP_MASK,
> > > 0)
> >
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

Reply via email to