On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Fix below compiler warning:
> 
> intel_tc.c:1879:11: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated
> writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 3
> [-Werror=format-truncation=]
> "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
>            ^~
> intel_tc.c:1878:2: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 7 and 17 bytes
> into a destination of size 8
>   snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
>     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> v2: use kasprintf(Imre)
> 
> Fixes: 3eafcddf766b ("drm/i915/tc: Move TC port fields to a new intel_tc_port 
> struct")
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy....@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>

Nit: port_name could be const.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index 37b0f8529b4f..0fa54450d51b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct intel_tc_port {
>       struct delayed_work link_reset_work;
>       int link_refcount;
>       bool legacy_port:1;
> -     char port_name[8];
> +     char *port_name;
>       enum tc_port_mode mode;
>       enum tc_port_mode init_mode;
>       enum phy_fia phy_fia;
> @@ -1875,8 +1875,10 @@ int intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port 
> *dig_port, bool is_legacy)
>       else
>               tc->phy_ops = &icl_tc_phy_ops;
>  
> -     snprintf(tc->port_name, sizeof(tc->port_name),
> -              "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port), tc_port + 1);
> +     tc->port_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%c/TC#%d", port_name(port),
> +                               tc_port + 1);
> +     if (!tc->port_name)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       mutex_init(&tc->lock);
>       /* TODO: Combine the two works */
> @@ -1897,6 +1899,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_cleanup(struct intel_digital_port 
> *dig_port)
>  {
>       intel_tc_port_suspend(dig_port);
>  
> +     kfree(dig_port->tc->port_name);
>       kfree(dig_port->tc);
>       dig_port->tc = NULL;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 

Reply via email to