On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 03:25:39PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Since commit 7de5b6b54630 ("drm/i915: Don't flag both full
> modeset and fastset at the same time")
> intel_crtc_needs_fastset() and intel_crtc_needs_modeset() have
> been mutually exclusive. Drop the redundant check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Let's see if the crash returns, however if it does then anyway
its time to change/refactor bigjoiner logic(as we suspected it
to be bigjoiner issue)
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 83e1bc858b9f..526f38b502be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -6606,7 +6606,7 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state,
> * valid pipe configuration from the BIOS we need to take care
> * of enabling them on the CRTC's first fastset.
> */
> - if (intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state) && !modeset &&
> + if (intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state) &&
> old_crtc_state->inherited)
> intel_crtc_arm_fifo_underrun(crtc, new_crtc_state);
> }
> --
> 2.41.0
>
