On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:41:45AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Currently we check if the pipe_bpp selected is >= the
> min DSC bpc/bpp requirement. We do not check if it is <= the max DSC
> bpc/bpp requirement.
>
> Add checks for max DSC BPC/BPP constraints while computing the
> pipe_bpp when DSC is in use.
>
> v2: Fix the commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index c87c3836966c..b296db026fd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1694,13 +1694,27 @@ u8 intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct
> drm_i915_private *i915)
> }
>
> static
> -bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int pipe_bpp)
> +bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> + struct link_config_limits *limits,
> + int pipe_bpp)
> {
> - return pipe_bpp >= intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(i915) * 3;
> + u8 dsc_max_bpc, dsc_min_bpc, dsc_max_pipe_bpp, dsc_min_pipe_bpp;
> +
> + dsc_max_bpc = min(intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(i915),
> conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> + dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(i915);
> +
> + dsc_max_pipe_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->max_bpp);
> + dsc_min_pipe_bpp = max(dsc_min_bpc * 3, limits->min_bpp);
> +
> + return pipe_bpp >= dsc_min_pipe_bpp &&
> + pipe_bpp <= dsc_max_pipe_bpp;
> }
>
> static
> -int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> + struct link_config_limits *limits)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int forced_bpp;
> @@ -1710,7 +1724,7 @@ int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>
> forced_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3;
>
> - if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, forced_bpp)) {
> + if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, conn_state, limits, forced_bpp)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Input DSC BPC forced to %d\n",
> intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
> return forced_bpp;
> }
> @@ -1732,16 +1746,16 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> u16 output_bpp, dsc_max_compressed_bpp = 0;
> int forced_bpp, pipe_bpp;
>
> - forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp);
> + forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state, limits);
>
> if (forced_bpp) {
> pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
> } else {
> pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(intel_dp,
> conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
>
> - if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, pipe_bpp)) {
> + if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, conn_state, limits,
> pipe_bpp)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> - "Computed BPC less than min supported by
> source for DSC\n");
> + "Computed BPC is not in DSC BPC limits\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> @@ -1783,7 +1797,7 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int pipe_bpp, forced_bpp;
>
> - forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp);
> + forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state, limits);
>
> if (forced_bpp) {
> pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
> @@ -1791,9 +1805,9 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> /* For eDP use max bpp that can be supported with DSC. */
> pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(intel_dp,
>
> conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> - if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, pipe_bpp)) {
> + if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, conn_state, limits,
> pipe_bpp)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> - "Computed BPC less than min supported by
> source for DSC\n");
> + "Computed BPC is not in DSC BPC limits\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.40.1
>
