On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:59:24PM -0700, Yi Liu wrote:
> +static inline long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd
> __user *arg)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
This should be -ENOTTY
> @@ -1149,6 +1151,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file
> *filep,
> void __user *uptr = (void __user *)arg;
> int ret;
>
> + if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
> + return vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, uptr);
> +
And this function has a mistake too:
default:
if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
ret = -EINVAL;
Should also be -ENOTTY
All the implementations of the ops already return -ENOTTY
However, I think this is all slightly not quite right, the proper
return code is supposed to be ENOIOCTLCMD which vfs_ioctl() then
translates into ENOTTY for some reason..
It looks Ok otherwise
Jason
