From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> Having a 4 byte register at 0x321b seems unlikely as that's not 4 byte aligned. Since later platforms have more or less the same FBC registers with new names, assume that FBC_FENCE_OFF is at 0x3218 just like DPFC_FENCE_YOFF.
This feels like a simple typo in BSpec. 321Bh looks a lot like 3218h after all. Should still be tested on real hardware of course. But I don't have any mobile gen4 systems. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 8d952b2..ade2a8e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ #define FBC_CTL_IDLE_DEBUG (3<<2) #define FBC_CTL_CPU_FENCE (1<<1) #define FBC_CTL_PLANE(plane) ((plane)<<0) -#define FBC_FENCE_OFF 0x0321b +#define FBC_FENCE_OFF 0x03218 /* BSpec typo has 321Bh */ #define FBC_TAG 0x03300 #define FBC_LL_SIZE (1536) -- 1.8.3.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
