On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:35:20AM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > We try to verify pll registers in sw state for slave crtc with the hw state. > However in case of bigjoiner we don't calculate those at all, so this > verification > will then always fail. > So we should either skip the verification for Bigjoiner slave crtc or copy sw > state > from master crtc. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index bf391a6cd8d6..83c98791fea3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -4556,6 +4556,7 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct > intel_atomic_state *state, > drm_mode_copy(&slave_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, > &master_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode); > slave_crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter = > master_crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter; > + slave_crtc_state->cx0pll_state = master_crtc_state->cx0pll_state;
Wrong place. Also we're already copying dpll_hw_state which is in the same union, and on first blush looks bigger than this thing. So why is that not working? > > copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_nomodeset(state, slave_crtc); > > -- > 2.37.3 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
