On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:22:51PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023, Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.mo...@intel.com> wrote:+ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf, size_t len, loff_t *offp) @@ -1065,6 +1080,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list intel_display_debugfs_list[] = { {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0}, {"i915_ddb_info", i915_ddb_info, 0}, {"i915_lpsp_status", i915_lpsp_status, 0}, + {"i915_disply_clock_info", i915_display_clock_info, 0},Maybe "i915_cdclk_info"? (Also, disply has a typo there.)
hijacking this a little bit since I saw the new version of this commit applied without the display_ part. Should we consider moving all the display-related debugfs files to display/ directory? I think that would make it clearer for the xe integration while also cleaning up a little bit the various files on i915. Downside would be synchronizing this with the tools reading those files. I guess it's only igt and CI that care about them? Lucas De Marchi
