From: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
The 'offset' field of the 'scatterlist' structure was wrongly
programmed with the offset value from the base of stolen area,
whereas this field indicates the offset from where the interested
data starts within the PAGE pointed to by the 'page-link' field.
As a result when a new GEM object allocated from the stolen
area is mapped to GTT, it could lead to an overwrite of GTT entries
as the page count calculation will go wrong, refer the function
'sg_page_count'.
Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index fed87ec..1a24e84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ i915_pages_create_for_stolen(struct drm_device *dev,
}
sg = st->sgl;
- sg->offset = offset;
+ sg->offset = 0;
sg->length = size;
sg_dma_address(sg) = (dma_addr_t)dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + offset;
--
1.8.5.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
