Currently in our bandwidth calculations for QGV
points we round up the calculations.
Recently there was an update to BSpec, recommending
to floor those calculations.
The reasoning behind this was that, overestimating
BW demand with that rounding can cause SAGV to use
next QGV point, even though the less demanding could
be used, thus resulting in waste of power.

BSpec: 64636

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index 202321ffbe2a..8723ddd4d568 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                dclk_reference = 6; /* 6 * 16.666 MHz = 100 MHz */
        else
                dclk_reference = 8; /* 8 * 16.666 MHz = 133 MHz */
-       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk_ratio * dclk_reference) + 500, 
1000);
+       sp->dclk = ((16667 * dclk_ratio * dclk_reference) + 500) / 1000;
 
        val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, 
SKL_MC_BIOS_DATA_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PCU);
        if (val & DG1_GEAR_TYPE)
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                return ret;
 
        dclk = val & 0xffff;
-       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk) + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 11 ? 
500 : 0), 1000);
+       sp->dclk = ((16667 * dclk) + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 11 ? 500 : 0)) / 
1000;
        sp->t_rp = (val & 0xff0000) >> 16;
        sp->t_rcd = (val & 0xff000000) >> 24;
 
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int mtl_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
        val2 = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore,
                                 MTL_MEM_SS_INFO_QGV_POINT_HIGH(point));
        dclk = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_DCLK_MASK, val);
-       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk), 1000);
+       sp->dclk = (16667 * dclk) / 1000;
        sp->t_rp = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_TRP_MASK, val);
        sp->t_rcd = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_TRCD_MASK, val);
 
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, const struct intel
                         */
                        ct = max_t(int, sp->t_rc, sp->t_rp + sp->t_rcd +
                                   (clpchgroup - 1) * qi.t_bl + sp->t_rdpre);
-                       bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * 
num_channels, ct);
+                       bw = (sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels) / ct;
 
                        bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
                                               bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, const struct intel
                         */
                        ct = max_t(int, sp->t_rc, sp->t_rp + sp->t_rcd +
                                   (clpchgroup - 1) * qi.t_bl + sp->t_rdpre);
-                       bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * 
num_channels, ct);
+                       bw = (sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels) / ct;
 
                        bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
                                               bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
-- 
2.37.3

Reply via email to