From: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
We use RPe here since it should match the Vmin we were shooting for.
That should give us better perf than if we used the min freq available.
System thermal can take the system to lowest possible freq (RPn). We are
making sure, we calmp the freq to min_delay (RPe).
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index ca7b537..7c98694 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4157,7 +4157,7 @@ static void valleyview_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay),
dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay);
- dev_priv->rps.min_delay = valleyview_rps_min_freq(dev_priv);
+ dev_priv->rps.min_delay = dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay;
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("min GPU freq: %d MHz (%u)\n",
vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.min_delay),
dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
--
1.8.4.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
