On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:28:49 +0100
Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:41:55PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > We want to preserve the BIOS/bootloader contents for later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > index db75f22..53675d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
> > struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > int size, ret;
> > + bool prealloc = false;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > @@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
> > goto out_unlock;
> > } else {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("re-using BIOS fb\n");
> > + prealloc = true;
> > sizes->fb_width = intel_fb->base.width;
> > sizes->fb_height = intel_fb->base.height;
> > }
> > @@ -203,7 +205,7 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
> > * If the object is stolen however, it will be full of whatever
> > * garbage was left in there.
> > */
> > - if (ifbdev->fb->obj->stolen)
> > + if (ifbdev->fb->obj->stolen && !prealloc)
> > memset_io(info->screen_base, 0, info->screen_size);
>
> Shouldn't we just move this into intelfb_alloc? Now that allocating our
> own fb isn't the only way any more to get at one this code + comment above
> looks a bit misplaced.
We can't since we haven't ioremapped the buffer and such until after
the alloc or reuse. It's a little awkward, I agree, but we need more
refactoring on the fbdev code to make it look nice.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
