> > This test hasn't been terribly effective at provoking the bug it tries > > to hit, so I think we can just unconditionally use the lower limit. > > That also helps with the really long runtime of this case a bit. > > -Daniel
Understood. I´ll simplify the patch and send it again then. > FWIW, all 3 of these patches, or their equivalents were in the branch I sent > in > my cover letter. I saw your series and I thought that I better send these patches over, but I missed that point in your cover letter, sorry :( How should we do it, then? will Daniel take them directly from your branch? -- Oscar _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
