On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:19:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > @@ -115,10 +116,14 @@ none: > > list_del_init(&vma->exec_list); > > } > > > > - /* We expect the caller to unpin, evict all and try again, or give > > up. > > - * So calling i915_gem_evict_vm() is unnecessary. > > + /* Can we unpin some objects such as idle hw contents, > > + * or pending flips? > > */ > > - return -ENOSPC; > > + ret = nonblocking ? -ENOSPC : i915_gpu_idle(dev); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + goto search_again; > > We need to make sure that we only try to do this once, for otherwise > we spin forever.
For sure. I had intended to do a if (pinned) do_idle(), but lost that track of thought when adding wait_for_flips. Too overexcited. Back to tracking damage. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
