On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 01:11:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:10:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:26:42AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
Commit 00c6cbfd4e8a ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask
to runtime info") moved the pipe_mask member from struct
intel_device_info to intel_runtime_info, but overlooked some of our
platforms initializing device info .display = {}. This is significant,
as pipe_mask is the single point of truth for a device having a display
or not; the platforms in question left pipe_mask to whatever was set for
the platforms they "inherit" from in the complex macro scheme we have.

Add new NO_DISPLAY macro initializing .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0, which
will cause the device info .display sub-struct to be zeroed in
intel_device_info_runtime_init(). A better solution (or simply audit of
proper use of HAS_DISPLAY() checks) is required before moving forward
with [1].

Also clear all the display related members in runtime info if there's no
display. The latter is a bit tedious, but it's for completeness at this
time, to ensure similar functionality as before.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/dfda1bf67f02ceb07c280b7a13216405fd1f7a34.1660137416.git.jani.nik...@intel.com

Fixes: 00c6cbfd4e8a ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask to runtime 
info")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhort <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          | 11 ++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c |  6 ++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 77e7df21f539..cd4487a1d3be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
        .__runtime.media.ip.ver = (x), \
        .__runtime.display.ip.ver = (x)

+#define NO_DISPLAY .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0
+
#define I845_PIPE_OFFSETS \
        .display.pipe_offsets = { \
                [TRANSCODER_A] = PIPE_A_OFFSET, \
@@ -519,9 +521,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info ivb_m_gt2_info = {
static const struct intel_device_info ivb_q_info = {
        GEN7_FEATURES,
        PLATFORM(INTEL_IVYBRIDGE),
+       NO_DISPLAY,
        .gt = 2,
-       .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0, /* legal, last one wins */
-       .__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = 0,
        .has_l3_dpf = 1,
};

@@ -1039,7 +1040,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info xehpsdv_info = {
        XE_HPM_FEATURES,
        DGFX_FEATURES,
        PLATFORM(INTEL_XEHPSDV),
-       .display = { },
+       NO_DISPLAY,
        .has_64k_pages = 1,
        .needs_compact_pt = 1,
        .has_media_ratio_mode = 1,
@@ -1081,7 +1082,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {

static const struct intel_device_info ats_m_info = {
        DG2_FEATURES,
-       .display = { 0 },
+       NO_DISPLAY,
        .require_force_probe = 1,
        .tuning_thread_rr_after_dep = 1,
};
@@ -1103,7 +1104,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info pvc_info = {
        .__runtime.graphics.ip.rel = 60,
        .__runtime.media.ip.rel = 60,
        PLATFORM(INTEL_PONTEVECCHIO),
-       .display = { 0 },
+       NO_DISPLAY,
        .has_flat_ccs = 0,
        .__runtime.platform_engine_mask =
                BIT(BCS0) |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 1434dc33cf49..20575eb77ea7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -433,8 +433,14 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                dev_priv->drm.driver_features &= ~(DRIVER_MODESET |
                                                   DRIVER_ATOMIC);
                memset(&info->display, 0, sizeof(info->display));
+
+               runtime->cpu_transcoder_mask = 0;
                memset(runtime->num_sprites, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_sprites));
                memset(runtime->num_scalers, 0, sizeof(runtime->num_scalers));
+               runtime->fbc_mask = 0;
+               runtime->has_hdcp = false;
+               runtime->has_dmc = false;
+               runtime->has_dsc = false;

why are these not inside __runtime.display?

The short answer, because there isn't one. It's an anonymous struct for
now.

/me confused... that doesn't really answer the question. Why would we
not move these inside a display substruct? When moving stuff out of
device_info.display.x, it seems the better place would be inside
__runtime.display.x, not __runtime.x.

I must be missing something here. We had a "recent" move of these flags
lying around in device_info to be inside a display substruct -
commit d53db442db36 ("drm/i915: Move display device info capabilities to its
own struct") - to be able to keep the display flags together
and zero them together.

So there were a few discussions spread around, but effectively the patch
has stalled here.

There's probably a bigger discussion to be had about the management of
mutable and immutable device info, and display and non-display info.

In the mean time, okay to merge this one?


Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi

Reply via email to