Hi Karolina,
[...]
> > > > + dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
> > > > + if (dma_fence_is_i915(fence) &&
> > > > + !i915_request_started(to_request(fence)))
> > > > + intel_rps_boost(to_request(fence));
> > > > + }
> >
> > you can remove the brackets here.
> >
> > Andi
>
> Would you like me to send v2 for it?
if the committer takes care of removing it, then no need,
otherwise, please yes, resend it. Even if it's a stupid nitpick,
if it gets applied it would be very difficult to get it fixed[*].
Didn't checkpatch.pl complain about it?
If you are going to resend it, you can add my:
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@linux.intel.com>
also here.
Thanks,
Andi
[*] Because just minor coding style patches are generally
rejected, the only way for fixing style issues would be if:
1. someone is working in that part of the code
2. someone will sneak in the code fix in some unrelated patch
screwing up git blame
3. someone will send a big series on this file and have some
trivial coding style patches in it.
Amongst the three above, number '2' is the one I dislike the
most, but unfortunately that's also the most used.
