On Fri, 01 Jul 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com> wrote:
> On linktraining error/timeout before retry need to wait for 400usec as
> per the DP CTS spec1.2
>
> The patch with commit 74ebf294a1dd ("drm/i915: Add a delay in Displayport
> AUX transactions for compliance testing")
> removes this delay mentioning the hardware already meets this requirement,
> but as per the spec the delay mentioned in the spec specifies how long to
> wait for the receiver response before timeout. So the delay here to wait
> for timeout and not a delay after timeout. The DP spec specifies a delay
> after timeout and hence adding this delay.
>
> v2: fixed checkpatch errors and warnings
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> index 2bc119374555..3fcff3995009 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> @@ -286,13 +286,9 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> /*
> * DP CTS 1.2 Core Rev 1.1, 4.2.1.1 & 4.2.1.2
> * 400us delay required for errors and timeouts
> - * Timeout errors from the HW already meet this
> - * requirement so skip to next iteration
> */
> - if (status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR) {
> + if (status & (DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR)) {
> usleep_range(400, 500);
> continue;
> }
Hate to be a nag, but this is what the indentation should look like:
- if (status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR) {
+ if (status & (DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
+ DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR)) {
usleep_range(400, 500);
continue;
}
i.e. leading tabs, then spaces. It'll pay off to have the editor do this
for you.
BR,
Jani.
--
2.30.2
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
