On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:31:07PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 01:49:54PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Sat, 09 Apr 2022, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > Some ADLP DP link configuration at least with multiple LTTPRs expects
> >> > the first DPCD access during the LTTPR/DPCD detection after hotplug to
> >> > be a read from the LTTPR range starting with
> >> > DP_LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV. The side effect of
> >> > this read is to put each LTTPR into the LTTPR transparent or LTTPR
> >> > non-transparent mode.
> >> >
> >> > The lack of the above read may leave some of the LTTPRs in non-LTTPR
> >> > mode, while other LTTPRs in LTTPR transparent or LTTPR non-transparent
> >> > mode (for instance LTTPRs after system suspend/resume that kept their
> >> > mode from before suspend). Due to the different AUX timeouts the
> >> > different modes imply, the DPCD access from a non-LTTPR range will
> >> > timeout and lead to an LTTPR generated hotplug towards the source (which
> >> > the LTTPR firmware uses to account for buggy TypeC adapters with a long
> >> > wake-up delay).
> >> >
> >> > To avoid the above AUX timeout and subsequent hotplug interrupt, make
> >> > sure that the first DPCD access during detection is a read from an
> >> > LTTPR register.
> >> >
> >> > VLK: SYSCROS-72939
> >> >
> >> > v2: Keep DPCD read-out working on non-LTTPR platforms.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> >> 
> >> I kinda dislike how complicated this looks for a diff so small. *shrug*.
> >> Seems to do what it says on the box,
> >
> > I can have a better summary of what the patch does and why at the
> > beginning of the commit message. Imo the details for the related LTTPR
> > behavior are still useful for later reference; it's not too intuitive
> > with the read side-effects for instance, neither it is well documented
> > by the DP standard.
> >
> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I pushed the dependent
> > d8bb92e70a43 ("drm/dp: Factor out a function to probe a DPCD address")
> > patch to drm-misc-next. Could you help back merging it to
> > drm-intel-next?
> 
> So this is going to need drm-misc-next -> drm-next pull request before I
> can backmerge drm-next to drm-intel-next.

Ok. AFAICS drm-next includes already the above commit.

> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> > ---
> >> >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 33 ++++++++++---------
> >> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c 
> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > index 26f9e2b748e40..9feaf1a589f38 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> >> > @@ -82,19 +82,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_read_lttpr_common_caps(struct 
> >> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> >                                              const u8 
> >> > dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> >> >  {
> >> >          struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> >> > -        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> >> >          int ret;
> >> >  
> >> > -        if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> >> > -                return false;
> >> > -
> >> > -        /*
> >> > -         * Detecting LTTPRs must be avoided on platforms with an AUX 
> >> > timeout
> >> > -         * period < 3.2ms. (see DP Standard v2.0, 2.11.2, 3.6.6.1).
> >> > -         */
> >> > -        if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(i915))
> >> > -                return false;
> >> > -
> >> >          ret = drm_dp_read_lttpr_common_caps(&intel_dp->aux, dpcd,
> >> >                                              
> >> > intel_dp->lttpr_common_caps);
> >> >          if (ret < 0)
> >> > @@ -197,13 +186,25 @@ static int intel_dp_init_lttpr(struct intel_dp 
> >> > *intel_dp, const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEI
> >> >   */
> >> >  int intel_dp_init_lttpr_and_dprx_caps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> >  {
> >> > -        u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
> >> > -        int lttpr_count;
> >> > +        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >> > +        int lttpr_count = 0;
> >> >  
> >> > -        if (drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(&intel_dp->aux, dpcd))
> >> > -                return -EIO;
> >> > +        /*
> >> > +         * Detecting LTTPRs must be avoided on platforms with an AUX 
> >> > timeout
> >> > +         * period < 3.2ms. (see DP Standard v2.0, 2.11.2, 3.6.6.1).
> >> > +         */
> >> > +        if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> >> > +            (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 10 && !IS_GEMINILAKE(i915))) {
> >> > +                u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
> >> >  
> >> > -        lttpr_count = intel_dp_init_lttpr(intel_dp, dpcd);
> >> > +                if (drm_dp_dpcd_probe(&intel_dp->aux, 
> >> > DP_LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV))
> >> > +                        return -EIO;
> >> > +
> >> > +                if (drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(&intel_dp->aux, dpcd))
> >> > +                        return -EIO;
> >> > +
> >> > +                lttpr_count = intel_dp_init_lttpr(intel_dp, dpcd);
> >> > +        }
> >> >  
> >> >          /*
> >> >           * The DPTX shall read the DPRX caps after LTTPR detection, so 
> >> > re-read
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to