On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 07:49:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> -
> >> - if (edid->revision > 4)
> >> - DRM_DEBUG("EDID minor > 4, assuming backward
> >> compatibility\n");
> >
> > This debug message seems to disappear. Intentional?
>
> Intentional, but failed to mention it in the commit message.
>
> Do we want to keep it? With my new approach, it basically means another
> valid return value that's distinct from just ok.
Seems pretty pointless to me. Especially with DisplayID on the
scene it seems rather unlikely that there would ever be EDID 1.5+.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
