On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 12:49 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular
> when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround
> or patches, which can fix that issue(were expecting some recent
> selective fetch update and DBuf bw/SAGV fixes to help,
> which unfortunately didn't).
> Current idea is that it looks like for some reason the
> DBuf prefill time isn't enough once we exit PSR2, despite its
> theoretically correct.
> So bump it up a bit by 15%(minimum experimental amount required
> to get it working), if PSR2 is enabled.
> For PSR1 there is no need in this hack, so we limit it only
> to PSR2 and Alderlake.
> 
> v2: - Added comment(Jose Souza)
>     - Fixed 15% calculation(Jose Souza)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 8888fda8b701..92d57869983a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -2325,6 +2325,32 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>                                       dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq));
>       }
>  
> +
> +     /*
> +      * HACK.  We are getting FIFO underruns, in particular
> +      * when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround
> +      * or patches as of now.
> +      * Current idea is that it looks like for some reason the
> +      * DBuf prefill time isn't enough once we exit PSR2, despite its
> +      * theoretically correct.
> +      * So bump it up a bit by 15%(minimum experimental amount required
> +      * to get it working), if PSR2 is enabled.
> +      * For PSR1 there is no need in this hack, so we limit it only
> +      * to PSR2 and Alderlake.
> +      */
> +     if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
> +             struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> +             for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
> +                     struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> +                     if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {

Again, you can't use this, PSR could end up disabled when this atomic commit it 
applied.
Please use intel_crtc_state.has_psr2.


> +                             min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_cdclk * 115, 100);
> +                             break;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       if (min_cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
>               drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>                           "required cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",

Reply via email to