[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915/dmc: fix i915_reg_t usage

[Jani Nikula]

i915_reg_t is supposed to be a somewhat opaque data type, not to be
looked inside.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index 2e11725a0828..5de13f978e57 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file 
*m, void *unused)
        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = m->private;
        intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
        struct intel_dmc *dmc;
-       i915_reg_t dc5_reg, dc6_reg = {};
+       i915_reg_t dc5_reg, dc6_reg = INVALID_MMIO_REG;
 
        if (!HAS_DMC(i915))
                return -ENODEV;
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file 
*m, void *unused)
        }
 
        seq_printf(m, "DC3 -> DC5 count: %d\n", intel_de_read(i915, dc5_reg));
-       if (dc6_reg.reg)
+       if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(dc6_reg))
                seq_printf(m, "DC5 -> DC6 count: %d\n",
                           intel_de_read(i915, dc6_reg));
 
-- 
2.30.2