On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:08:18PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> index 4ee578b181da..a8cbd90db9d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> @@ -1060,26 +1060,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sas_port_get_phy);
>   * connected to a remote device is a port, so ports must be formed on
>   * all devices with phys if they're connected to anything.
>   */
> -void sas_port_add_phy(struct sas_port *port, struct sas_phy *phy)
> +void sas_port_add_phy(struct sas_port *port, struct sas_phy *_phy)

_phy is an unfortunate name.

>  {
>       mutex_lock(&port->phy_list_mutex);
> -     if (unlikely(!list_empty(&phy->port_siblings))) {
> +     if (unlikely(!list_empty(&_phy->port_siblings))) {
>               /* make sure we're already on this port */
> +             struct sas_phy *phy = NULL;

Maybe call this port_phy?

>               struct sas_phy *tmp;
> 
>               list_for_each_entry(tmp, &port->phy_list, port_siblings)
> -                     if (tmp == phy)
> +                     if (tmp == _phy) {
> +                             phy = tmp;
>                               break;
> +                     }
>               /* If this trips, you added a phy that was already
>                * part of a different port */
> -             if (unlikely(tmp != phy)) {
> +             if (unlikely(!phy)) {
>                       dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &port->dev, "trying to add phy %s 
> fails: it's already part of another port\n",
> -                                dev_name(&phy->dev));
> +                                dev_name(&_phy->dev));
>                       BUG();
>               }
>       } else {
> -             sas_port_create_link(port, phy);
> -             list_add_tail(&phy->port_siblings, &port->phy_list);
> +             sas_port_create_link(port, _phy);
> +             list_add_tail(&_phy->port_siblings, &port->phy_list);
>               port->num_phys++;
>       }
>       mutex_unlock(&port->phy_list_mutex);

regards,
dan carpenter

Reply via email to