On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/10/25 Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>:
> > The only real need for this field was in
> > i915_{request,release}_power_well, but there we can get at it by a
> > container_of magic. Also since in the future we'll have multiple power
> > wells each with its own power_well struct it makes sense to remove the
> > field from there where it'd be just redundancy.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.zan...@intel.com>
> 
> My original idea was to just move it from i915_power_well to
> i915_power_domains, so hsw_pwr (which is the new external static
> thing) would still have a pointer to our driver. This way we wouldn't
> need the container_of magic. But your solution works too, and saves
> 4/8 bytes :)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>

First 3 patches merged, thanks.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to