On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:05:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > con2fb_release_oldinfo() has a bunch more kfree() calls than > fbcon_exit(), but since kfree() on NULL is harmless doing that in both > places should be ok. This is also a bit more symmetric now again with > fbcon_open also allocating the fbcon_ops structure. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: Du Cheng <duche...@gmail.com> > Cc: Claudio Suarez <c...@net-c.es>
Thanks, like I wrote earlier this makes sense. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
