On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:51:15AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This "ret" declaration shadows an existing "ret" variable at the top of
> the function.  Delete it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>

and pushing right now

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> index 0026e85a0a0d..b66591d6e436 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> @@ -505,8 +505,6 @@ int i915_vma_bind(struct i915_vma *vma,
>                       work->pinned = i915_gem_object_get(vma->obj);
>       } else {
>               if (vma->obj) {
> -                     int ret;
> -
>                       ret = i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(vma->obj, true);
>                       if (ret) {
>                               i915_vma_resource_free(vma->resource);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to