On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:15:39AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > Don't see why we should skip the wakeref tracking when the > platform doesn't support runtime pm. We still want all the > code to be 100% leak free so let's track this unconditionally. > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> > Cc: Marco Elver <el...@google.com> # stackdepot > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 64c2708efc9e..3293ac71bcf8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) > depot_stack_handle_t stack, *stacks; > unsigned long flags; > > - if (!rpm->available) > - return -1; > - > stack = __save_depot_stack(); > if (!stack) > return -1; > -- > 2.34.1 >
