Yet another direct usage of the pipe number instead of pipe_name().
We've been tracking them lately but managed to miss this one.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index b9cede7..81f7fa5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -10734,11 +10734,11 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct
drm_device *dev)
}
encoder->connectors_active = false;
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] hw state readout: %s, pipe=%i\n",
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] hw state readout: %s, pipe %c\n",
encoder->base.base.id,
drm_get_encoder_name(&encoder->base),
encoder->base.crtc ? "enabled" : "disabled",
- pipe);
+ pipe_name(pipe));
}
list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list,
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
