On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:52:42PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > Continuing a bit with improving the vblank timestamp stuff, I decided that > it's also time to fix gen2 properly. > > All this time we've been pretending it has the same pixel+frame counter that > gen3 and gen4 have, when in fact it doesn't. Luckily the same offset has > nothing else on gen2, so it has just read out as 0 and everything more or > less worked. > > Sadly there doesn't seem to be any frame counter register on gen2. For the > scanout position, DSL + additional tricks works equally well for gen2 as > it does for ctg+.
Confirmed the absence of said registers, so Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
