On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 14:28, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Now that we require locking to evict, multiple vmas from the same object > might not be evicted. This is expected and required, because execbuf will > move to short-term pinning by using the lock only. This will cause these > tests to fail, because they create a ton of vma's for the same object. > > Unbind manually to prevent spurious -ENOSPC in those mock tests. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/17] drm/i915: Add obje... Matthew Auld
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/17] drm/i915: Add ... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/17] drm/i915: Remove short-term... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/17] drm/i915: Trylock the objec... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/17] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbi... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/17] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evi... Maarten Lankhorst
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/17] drm/i915: Call i91... Matthew Auld
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/17] drm/i915: Call... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/17] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma t... Maarten Lankhorst
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/17] drm/i915: Ensure i... Matthew Auld
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Re... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Remove... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915: Remove s... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove sh... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Remove sh... Patchwork