As we delay the initial RPS enabling (upon boot and after resume), there
is a chance that we may start to render and trigger RPS boosts before we
set up the punit. Any changes we make could result in inconsistent
hardware state, with a danger of causing undefined behaviour. However,
as the boosting is a optional tweak to RPS, we can simply ignore it
whilst RPS is not yet enabled.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |    1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 640bff2..e0152e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -874,6 +874,7 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
        int last_adj;
        enum { LOW_POWER, BETWEEN, HIGH_POWER } power;
 
+       bool enabled;
        struct delayed_work delayed_resume_work;
 
        /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 6ffeb04..8070a07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3435,22 +3435,26 @@ void gen6_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, u8 val)
 void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
        mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
-       if (dev_priv->info->is_valleyview)
-               valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
-       else
-               gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
-       dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
+       if (dev_priv->rps.enabled) {
+               if (dev_priv->info->is_valleyview)
+                       valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, 
dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
+               else
+                       gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.min_delay);
+               dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
+       }
        mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 }
 
 void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
        mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
-       if (dev_priv->info->is_valleyview)
-               valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
-       else
-               gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
-       dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
+       if (dev_priv->rps.enabled) {
+               if (dev_priv->info->is_valleyview)
+                       valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, 
dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
+               else
+                       gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
+               dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
+       }
        mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 }
 
@@ -4657,6 +4661,7 @@ void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_device *dev)
                        valleyview_disable_rps(dev);
                else
                        gen6_disable_rps(dev);
+               dev_priv->rps.enabled = false;
                mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
        }
 }
@@ -4676,6 +4681,7 @@ static void intel_gen6_powersave_work(struct work_struct 
*work)
                gen6_enable_rps(dev);
                gen6_update_ring_freq(dev);
        }
+       dev_priv->rps.enabled = true;
        mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to