On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com> wrote:
> In case of CD clock squashing the divider is always 1. We don't
> need to calculate the divider in use so let's skip that for DG2.
>
> v2: Drop unnecessary local variable (Ville)
> v3: Avoid if-else structure (Ville)
> [v4: vsyrjala: Fix cd2x divider calculation (Uma),
>                Introduce has_cdclk_squasher()]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 630a53d4f882..e8c58779c2a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1212,6 +1212,11 @@ static void skl_cdclk_uninit_hw(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_config, INVALID_PIPE);
>  }
>  
> +static bool has_cdclk_squasher(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +     return IS_DG2(i915);
> +}

The obvious problem is that you use this function already in patch 2.

I'm also not sure we want to start sprinkling the has_ or HAS_ query
stuff all over the place in .c. files. Or if we do, we should do it in a
more planned manner, not by starting to sneak these in.

BR,
Jani.

> +
>  static const struct intel_cdclk_vals bxt_cdclk_table[] = {
>       { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 144000, .divider = 8, .ratio = 60 },
>       { .refclk = 19200, .cdclk = 288000, .divider = 4, .ratio = 60 },
> @@ -1750,7 +1755,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>  static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       u32 cdctl, expected;
> -     int cdclk, vco;
> +     int cdclk, clock, vco;
>  
>       intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
>       intel_dump_cdclk_config(&dev_priv->cdclk.hw, "Current CDCLK");
> @@ -1786,8 +1791,12 @@ static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       expected = skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
>  
>       /* Figure out what CD2X divider we should be using for this cdclk */
> -     expected |= bxt_cdclk_cd2x_div_sel(dev_priv,
> -                                        dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk,
> +     if (has_cdclk_squasher(dev_priv))
> +             clock = dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco / 2;
> +     else
> +             clock = dev_priv->cdclk.hw.cdclk;
> +
> +     expected |= bxt_cdclk_cd2x_div_sel(dev_priv, clock,
>                                          dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco);
>  
>       /*

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to