On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:40:37PM -0700, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
> 
> The 'many' test ended with an 'assert(count)', presumably meaning to
> ensure that some objects were actually captured. However, 'count' is
> the number of objects created not how many were captured. Plus, there
> is already a 'require(count > 1)' at the start and count is invarient
> so the final assert is basically pointless.
> 
> General concensus appears to be that the test should not fail
> irrespective of how many blobs are captured as low memory situations
> could cause the capture to be abbreviated. So just remove the
> pointless assert completely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 7e0a8b8ad..53649cdb2 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned 
> int flags)
>       }
>       igt_info("Captured %lu %"PRId64"-blobs out of a total of %lu\n",
>                blobs, size >> 12, count);
> -     igt_assert(count);
>  
>       free(error);
>       free(offsets);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Reply via email to