On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:56:31PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
The first step of interrupt handling is to read a tile0 register that
tells us in which tile the interrupt happened; we can then we read the
usual interrupt registers from the appropriate tile.
Note that this is just the first step of handling interrupts properly on
multi-tile platforms. Subsequent patches will convert other parts of
the interrupt handling flow.
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summ...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 038a9ec563c1..9f99ad56cde6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2772,37 +2772,38 @@ static irqreturn_t dg1_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
{
struct drm_i915_private * const i915 = arg;
struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
- void __iomem * const regs = gt->uncore->regs;
+ void __iomem * const t0_regs = gt->uncore->regs;
given that we later make gt point elsewhere since it's now only used
inside the loop, I think this would be clearer with
void __iomem * const t0_regs = i915->gt->uncore->regs;
struct intel_gt *gt;
but see below
u32 master_tile_ctl, master_ctl;
- u32 gu_misc_iir;
+ u32 gu_misc_iir = 0;
+ unsigned int i;
if (!intel_irqs_enabled(i915))
return IRQ_NONE;
- master_tile_ctl = dg1_master_intr_disable(regs);
+ master_tile_ctl = dg1_master_intr_disable(t0_regs);
if (!master_tile_ctl) {
- dg1_master_intr_enable(regs);
+ dg1_master_intr_enable(t0_regs);
return IRQ_NONE;
}
- /* FIXME: we only support tile 0 for now. */
- if (master_tile_ctl & DG1_MSTR_TILE(0)) {
+ for_each_gt(i915, i, gt) {
+ void __iomem *const regs = gt->uncore->regs;
+
+ if ((master_tile_ctl & DG1_MSTR_TILE(i)) == 0)
+ continue;
+
master_ctl = raw_reg_read(regs, GEN11_GFX_MSTR_IRQ);
raw_reg_write(regs, GEN11_GFX_MSTR_IRQ, master_ctl);
- } else {
- DRM_ERROR("Tile not supported: 0x%08x\n", master_tile_ctl);
- dg1_master_intr_enable(regs);
- return IRQ_NONE;
- }
- gen11_gt_irq_handler(gt, master_ctl);
+ gen11_gt_irq_handler(gt, master_ctl);
+
+ gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(gt, master_ctl);
+ }
if (master_ctl & GEN11_DISPLAY_IRQ)
gen11_display_irq_handler(i915);
- gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(gt, master_ctl);
-
- dg1_master_intr_enable(regs);
+ dg1_master_intr_enable(t0_regs);
gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(gt, gu_misc_iir);
since we used gt in the for_each_gt() loop it looks like this is not
the gt we wanted anymore. Alas gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler() only uses gt
to backpoint to i915... so I'm not sure if it should actually be taking
a gt as parameter if it is per device rather than per tile/gt.
Lucas De Marchi
--
2.33.0
