On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 01:35:12PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > index 79a7552af7b5..1375d963c0a8 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -8818,6 +8818,8 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct 
>> > intel_atomic_state *state)
>> >            intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(state);
>> >    }
>> >  
>> > +  intel_wait_for_vblank_works(state);
>> 
>> Nitpick, I think the function name can be confusing due to the plural
>> vs. verb here. intel_wait_for_vblank_work_end(), _finish(), _done()?
>
> I guess _end() would match what I called the tracepoint. Another
> idea could be s/works/workers/

Either works for me.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to