Am 13.10.21 um 16:07 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:37:26PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Simplifying the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
index e8d70b6e6737..722e3c9e8882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
@@ -1345,10 +1345,9 @@ static bool amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct
ttm_buffer_object *bo,
const struct ttm_place *place)
{
unsigned long num_pages = bo->resource->num_pages;
+ struct dma_resv_iter resv_cursor;
struct amdgpu_res_cursor cursor;
- struct dma_resv_list *flist;
struct dma_fence *f;
- int i;
/* Swapout? */
if (bo->resource->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)
@@ -1362,14 +1361,9 @@ static bool amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct
ttm_buffer_object *bo,
* If true, then return false as any KFD process needs all its BOs to
* be resident to run successfully
*/
- flist = dma_resv_shared_list(bo->base.resv);
- if (flist) {
- for (i = 0; i < flist->shared_count; ++i) {
- f = rcu_dereference_protected(flist->shared[i],
- dma_resv_held(bo->base.resv));
- if (amdkfd_fence_check_mm(f, current->mm))
- return false;
- }
+ dma_resv_for_each_fence(&resv_cursor, bo->base.resv, true, f) {
^false?
At least I'm not seeing the code look at the exclusive fence here.
Yes, but that's correct. We need to look at all potential fences.
It's a design problem in KFD if you ask me, but that is a completely
different topic.
Christian.
-Daniel
+ if (amdkfd_fence_check_mm(f, current->mm))
+ return false;
}
switch (bo->resource->mem_type) {
--
2.25.1
