On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:17 PM Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > Reanme intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable() to hsw_fdi_disable() and > relocate it next to all the other code dealing with FDI_RX. > intel_ddi.c has now been cleansed of FDI_RX. > > In order to avoid exposing intel_disable_ddi_buf() outside > intel_ddi.c we can just open code the DDI_BUF_CTL write. The > enable side already has all that stuff open coded so > this actually is more symmetric. But we do need to remeber > to bring the intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle() call over from > inside intel_disable_ddi_buf(). > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
