[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Fix dma_resv_wait_timeout handling of timeout = 0.

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Commit ada5c48b11a3 ("dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_wait_timeout")
accidentally started mishandling timeout = 0, by forcing a blocking wait
with timeout = 1 passed to fences. This is not intended, as timeout = 0
may be used for peeking, similar to test_signaled.

Fixes: ada5c48b11a3 ("dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_wait_timeout")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
index 9eb2baa387d4..70a8082660c5 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -617,18 +617,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_resv_get_fences);
 long dma_resv_wait_timeout(struct dma_resv *obj, bool wait_all, bool intr,
                           unsigned long timeout)
 {
-       long ret = timeout ? timeout : 1;
+       long ret = timeout ?: 1;
        struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
        struct dma_fence *fence;
 
        dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, obj, wait_all);
        dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
+               ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, timeout);
+               if (ret <= 0)
+                       break;
 
-               ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, ret);
-               if (ret <= 0) {
-                       dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
-                       return ret;
-               }
+               if (timeout)
+                       timeout = ret;
        }
        dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
 
-- 
2.33.0