[AMD Official Use Only]

Thanks, Greg and Jani. So I have to do the exact opposite.

We do have some NULL dentry check in the drm code. I will remove those instead.

Regards,
Nirmoy
________________________________
From: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 1:07 PM
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Das, Nirmoy <nirmoy....@amd.com>; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org 
<dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org 
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maarten Lankhorst 
<maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>; Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org>; Thomas 
Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>; David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>; Daniel 
Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] dri: cleanup debugfs error handling

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:40:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2021, Nirmoy Das <nirmoy....@amd.com> wrote:
> > Debugfs API returns encoded error instead of NULL.
> > This patch cleanups drm debugfs error handling to
> > properly set dri and its minor's root dentry to NULL.
> >
> > Also do not error out if dri/minor debugfs directory
> > creation fails as a debugfs error is not a fatal error.
>
> Cc: Greg
>
> I thought this is the opposite of what Greg's been telling everyone to
> do with debugfs.

Yes, that is not good.

You should never care about the result of a debugfs_create* call.  Just
take the result, and if it is a directory, save it off to use it for
creating a file, no need to check anything.

And then throw it away, later, when you want to remove the directory,
look it up with a call to debugfs_lookup() and pass that to
debugfs_remove() (which does so recursively).

There should never be a need to save, or check, the result of any
debugfs call.  If so, odds are it is being used incorrectly.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to