On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 02:55:32PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com writes:
> 
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll() to use intel_clock_t rather than
> > an army of local variables.
> >
> > Also extract the code to calculate the derived values into
> > vlv_clock().
> >
> > v2: Split up the earlier fixes, extract vlv_clock()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 72 
> > ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index f646fea..c5f0794 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -438,6 +438,14 @@ static void i9xx_clock(int refclk, intel_clock_t 
> > *clock)
> >     clock->dot = clock->vco / clock->p;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void vlv_clock(int refclk, intel_clock_t *clock)
> > +{
> > +   clock->m = clock->m1 * clock->m2;
> > +   clock->p = clock->p1 * clock->p2;
> > +   clock->vco = refclk * clock->m / clock->n;
> > +   clock->dot = clock->vco / clock->p;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * Returns whether any output on the specified pipe is of the specified 
> > type
> >   */
> > @@ -670,66 +678,48 @@ vlv_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct 
> > drm_crtc *crtc,
> >                int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
> >                intel_clock_t *best_clock)
> >  {
> > -   u32 p1, p2, m1, m2, vco, bestn, bestm1, bestm2, bestp1, bestp2;
> > -   u32 m, n, fastclk;
> > -   u32 updrate, minupdate, p;
> > +   intel_clock_t clock;
> > +   u32 minupdate = 19200;
> >     unsigned int bestppm = 1000000;
> > -   int dotclk, flag;
> >  
> > -   flag = 0;
> > -   dotclk = target * 1000;
> > -   fastclk = dotclk / (2*100);
> > -   updrate = 0;
> > -   minupdate = 19200;
> > -   n = p = p1 = p2 = m = m1 = m2 = vco = bestn = 0;
> > -   bestm1 = bestm2 = bestp1 = bestp2 = 0;
> > +   target *= 5; /* fast clock */
> >  
> >     /* based on hardware requirement, prefer smaller n to precision */
> > -   for (n = limit->n.min; n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); n++) {
> > -           updrate = refclk / n;
> > -           for (p1 = limit->p1.max; p1 > limit->p1.min; p1--) {
> > -                   for (p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast+1; p2 > 0; p2--) {
> > -                           if (p2 > 10)
> > -                                   p2 = p2 - 1;
> > -                           p = p1 * p2;
> > +   for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); 
> > clock.n++) {
> > +           for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.max; clock.p1 > limit->p1.min; 
> > clock.p1--) {
> > +                   for (clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast+1; clock.p2 > 0; 
> > clock.p2--) {
> > +                           if (clock.p2 > 10)
> > +                                   clock.p2--;
> > +                           clock.p = clock.p1 * clock.p2;
> >                             /* based on hardware requirement, prefer bigger 
> > m1,m2 values */
> > -                           for (m1 = limit->m1.min; m1 <= limit->m1.max; 
> > m1++) {
> > +                           for (clock.m1 = limit->m1.min; clock.m1 <= 
> > limit->m1.max; clock.m1++) {
> >                                     unsigned int ppm, diff;
> >  
> > -                                   m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(fastclk * p * n, 
> > refclk * m1);
> > -                                   m = m1 * m2;
> > -                                   vco = updrate * m;
> > +                                   clock.m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(target * 
> > clock.p * clock.n,
> > +                                                                refclk * 
> > clock.m1);
> >  
> > -                                   if (vco < limit->vco.min || vco >= 
> > limit->vco.max)
> > +                                   vlv_clock(refclk, &clock);
> > +
> > +                                   if (clock.vco < limit->vco.min ||
> > +                                       clock.vco >= limit->vco.max)
> >                                             continue;
> >  
> > -                                   diff = abs(vco / p - fastclk);
> > -                                   ppm = div_u64(1000000ULL * diff, 
> > fastclk);
> > -                                   if (ppm < 100 && ((p1 * p2) > (bestp1 * 
> > bestp2))) {
> > +                                   diff = abs(clock.dot - target);
> > +                                   ppm = div_u64(1000000ULL * diff, 
> > target);
> > +
> > +                                   if (ppm < 100 && clock.p > 
> > best_clock->p) {
> 
> best_clock needs to be initialized or you end up comparing against
> bytes from stack on first hitting here.

Right. v3 coming up.

> 
> >                                             bestppm = 0;
> > -                                           flag = 1;
> > +                                           *best_clock = clock;
> >                                     }
> > +
> >                                     if (bestppm >= 10 && ppm < bestppm - 
> > 10) {
> >                                             bestppm = ppm;
> > -                                           flag = 1;
> > -                                   }
> > -                                   if (flag) {
> > -                                           bestn = n;
> > -                                           bestm1 = m1;
> > -                                           bestm2 = m2;
> > -                                           bestp1 = p1;
> > -                                           bestp2 = p2;
> > -                                           flag = 0;
> > +                                           *best_clock = clock;
> >                                     }
> >                             }
> >                     }
> >             }
> >     }
> > -   best_clock->n = bestn;
> > -   best_clock->m1 = bestm1;
> > -   best_clock->m2 = bestm2;
> > -   best_clock->p1 = bestp1;
> > -   best_clock->p2 = bestp2;
> >  
> >     return true;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to