Re-reported. Lakshmi.
From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 12:07 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vu...@intel.com> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3) On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 20:28 +0000, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3) URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91893/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20819/index.html CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10482_full -> Patchwork_20819_full Summary FAILURE Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20819_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_20819_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20819_full: IGT changes Possible regressions * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic: * shard-glk: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10482/shard-glk8/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html> -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20819/shard-glk5/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html> Lakshmi, this failure is unrelated. Thanks, Thomas
