On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 08:51:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This regression has been introduced in
> 
> commit 9f11a9e4e50006b615ba94722dfc33ced89664cf
> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Date:   Thu Jun 13 00:54:58 2013 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: set up PIPECONF explicitly for i9xx/vlv platforms
> 
> Ville brough up the idea that this is just the pipe A quirk gone
> wrong.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
> References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/26/238
> Cc: Meelis Roos <mr...@ut.ee>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index f7d868e..be97b42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4833,7 +4833,11 @@ static void i9xx_set_pipeconf(struct intel_crtc 
> *intel_crtc)
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>       uint32_t pipeconf;
>  
> -     pipeconf = 0;
> +     if (dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE) {
> +             pipeconf =
> +                     I915_READ(PIPECONF(intel_crtc->pipe)) & PIPECONF_ENABLE;
> +     } else
> +             pipeconf = 0;

Hmm. Why not just this?

pipeconf = 0;
if (pipe == PIPE_A && QUIRK)
 pipeconf |= PIPECONF_ENABLE;

>  
>       if (intel_crtc->config.double_wide)
>               pipeconf |= PIPECONF_DOUBLE_WIDE;
> -- 
> 1.8.4.rc3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to