On 28.07.2021 23:11, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure
> for range checking while setting min/max frequencies.
>
> Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes
> made from userland. These are initially set to platform min
> and max.
>
> v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
> v3: Formatting (Michal W)
> v4: Add separate function to parse rp values (Michal W)
> v5: Perform range checking for set min/max (Michal W)
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaum...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 9 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +
> 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index 742918875593..bfd5fb0751fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc)
> return err;
> }
>
> + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
> + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
shouldn't this be in intel_guc_slpc_init() ?
> +
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -124,6 +127,18 @@ static int guc_action_slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc
> *guc, u8 id, u32 value)
> return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
> }
>
> +static int guc_action_slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id)
> +{
> + u32 request[] = {
> + GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_PC_SLPC_REQUEST,
> + SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_PARAMETER_UNSET, 2),
> + id,
> + };
> +
> + return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
> +}
> +
> +
> static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> {
> return slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING;
> @@ -177,6 +192,16 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
> u8 id, u32 value)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
> + u8 id)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_PARAM);
> +
> + return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id);
> +}
> +
> static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state)
> {
> switch (state) {
> @@ -307,6 +332,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc, u32 val)
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> int ret;
>
> + if ((val < slpc->min_freq) ||
> + (val > slpc->rp0_freq) ||
> + (val < slpc->min_freq_softlimit))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
> ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
> SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> @@ -317,6 +347,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc, u32 val)
> ret = -EIO;
> }
>
> + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = val;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -363,6 +395,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc, u32 val)
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> int ret;
>
> + if ((val < slpc->min_freq) ||
> + (val > slpc->rp0_freq) ||
> + (val > slpc->max_freq_softlimit))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
> ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
> SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> @@ -373,6 +410,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc, u32 val)
> ret = -EIO;
> }
>
> + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = val;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -418,6 +457,71 @@ void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt)
> GEN6_PMINTRMSK, pm_intrmsk_mbz, 0);
> }
>
> +static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Softlimits are initially equivalent to platform limits
> + * unless they have deviated from defaults, in which case,
> + * we retain the values and set min/max accordingly.
> + */
> + if (!slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
> + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = slpc->rp0_freq;
> + else if (slpc->max_freq_softlimit != slpc->rp0_freq)
> + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc,
> + slpc->max_freq_softlimit);
if this fails, shouldn't we reset max_freq_softlimit to platform limit ?
otherwise we could be with some potentially bad value forever
> +
> + if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
> + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq;
> + else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq)
> + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc,
> + slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
similar here
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool
> ignore)
static functions don't need "intel_guc" prefix
slpc_ignore_eff_freq
> +{
> + /* A failure here does not affect the algorithm in a fatal way */
> + if (ignore) {
> + slpc_set_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY,
> + ignore);
> + slpc_set_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> + slpc->min_freq);
> + } else {
> + slpc_unset_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY);
> + slpc_unset_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ);
indents are likely wrong
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
slpc_use_fused_rp0
> +{
> + /* Force SLPC to used platform rp0 */
> + slpc_set_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> + slpc->rp0_freq);
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_get_rp_values(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> + u32 rp_state_cap;
> +
> + rp_state_cap = intel_uncore_read(slpc_to_gt(slpc)->uncore,
> + GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> +
> + slpc->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> + slpc->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP1_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> + slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC
> * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc.
> @@ -453,6 +557,17 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>
> intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(&i915->gt);
>
> + slpc_get_rp_values(slpc);
> +
> + /* Ignore efficient freq and set min/max to platform min/max */
> + intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true);
> + intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc);
> +
> + ret = slpc_set_softlimits(slpc);
> + if (ret)
> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
indent ?
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> index 3cefe19b17b2..41d13527666f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc {
> struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr;
> bool supported;
> bool selected;
> +
> + /* platform frequency limits */
> + u32 min_freq;
> + u32 rp0_freq;
> + u32 rp1_freq;
> +
> + /* frequency softlimits */
> + u32 min_freq_softlimit;
> + u32 max_freq_softlimit;
> };
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 5603377e06ca..f3a445f79a36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4109,6 +4109,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> #define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070)
> #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994)
> #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998)
> +#define RP0_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define RP1_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define RPN_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
> #define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(0x138170)
> #define GEN9_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(0x138148)
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
