Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoy...@intel.com>
-caz

On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 22:41 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> For historical reasons, the GT forcewake domain used to be referred
> to
> as the "blitter" domain; that name is no longer accurate since the GT
> domain contains a lot of additional registers and functionality
> besides
> just the blitter.  Although we renamed the domain in the driver in
> commit 55e3c170950f ("drm/i915: Rename FORCEWAKE_BLITTER to
> FORCEWAKE_GT"), we neglected to update the string that gets printed
> in
> driver error messages; let's do that now to avoid confusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 8cf53f54559d..bca548c81572 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void mmio_debug_resume(struct
> intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug)
>  
>  static const char * const forcewake_domain_names[] = {
>       "render",
> -     "blitter",
> +     "gt",
>       "media",
>       "vdbox0",
>       "vdbox1",
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to