On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:38:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c >> > index c38d575..763283e 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c >> > @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct drm_device >> > *dev, >> > >> > error->ring[i].num_requests = count; >> > error->ring[i].requests = >> > - kmalloc(count*sizeof(struct drm_i915_error_request), >> > + kcalloc(count, sizeof(error->ring[i].requests), >> >> Crash boom bang. > > Not quite. This is evaluated at compile time by parsing the type rather > than by pointer dereference.
Sizeof changes from sizeof(struct drm_i915_error_request) to sizeof(struct drm_i915_error_request *). It'll break something. Maybe not as spectacularly as I was implying. Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
