On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:29:29PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > drm_file.master should be protected by either drm_device.master_mutex > or drm_file.master_lookup_lock when being dereferenced. However, > drm_master_get is called on unprotected file_priv->master pointers in > vmw_surface_define_ioctl and vmw_gb_surface_define_internal. > > This is fixed by replacing drm_master_get with drm_file_get_master. > > Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheon...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> I'll let Zack take a look at this and expect him to push this patch to drm-misc.git. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c > index 0eba47762bed..5d53a5f9d123 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c > @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void > *data, > user_srf->prime.base.shareable = false; > user_srf->prime.base.tfile = NULL; > if (drm_is_primary_client(file_priv)) > - user_srf->master = drm_master_get(file_priv->master); > + user_srf->master = drm_file_get_master(file_priv); > > /** > * From this point, the generic resource management functions > @@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ vmw_gb_surface_define_internal(struct drm_device *dev, > > user_srf = container_of(srf, struct vmw_user_surface, srf); > if (drm_is_primary_client(file_priv)) > - user_srf->master = drm_master_get(file_priv->master); > + user_srf->master = drm_file_get_master(file_priv); > > res = &user_srf->srf.res; > > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
