On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:49:05AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display
stepping-substepping combinations.
Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues
the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step
Adding the helper intel_get_display_step().
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = {
};
static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
+struct stepping_info *display_step;
+
+static struct stepping_info *
+intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step)
+{
+
+ switch (step.display_step) {
+ case STEP_A0:
+ display_step->stepping = 'A';
+ display_step->substepping = '0';
+ break;
+ case STEP_A2:
+ display_step->stepping = 'A';
+ display_step->substepping = '2';
+ break;
+ case STEP_B0:
+ display_step->stepping = 'B';
+ display_step->substepping = '0';
+ break;
+ case STEP_B1:
+ display_step->stepping = 'B';
+ display_step->substepping = '1';
+ break;
+ case STEP_C0:
+ display_step->stepping = 'C';
+ display_step->substepping = '0';
+ break;
+ case STEP_D0:
+ display_step->stepping = 'D';
+ display_step->substepping = '0';
+ break;
+ default:
+ display_step->stepping = '*';
+ display_step->substepping = '*';
+ break;
+ }
"crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion:
changing the step enum to be:
#define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num))
STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'),
STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'),
and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and
handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER.
Maybe it is crazy, dunno.
+Jani / +Jose. Thoughts?
Frankly, I think all of this should be incorporated to intel_step.[ch]
instead of having a semi-overlapping handling here. Just look at the
amount of duplication already.
I guess you missed I gave the same suggestion below and that there is
already a new version of this patch? Question here was about going a
step further to avoid the conversion STEP_* to 2 chars.
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
BR,
Jani.
For this version the next comment is probably more important.
+ return display_step;
+}
static const struct stepping_info *
intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
const struct stepping_info *si;
+ struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step;
unsigned int size;
- if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
+ si = intel_get_display_stepping(step);
+ } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info);
si = icl_stepping_info;
can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms.
Notice that before the separation we will have display_step ==
graphics_step, so it should just work.
Lucas De Marchi
} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
@@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
si = NULL;
}
- if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size)
- return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv);
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
+ return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) :
&no_stepping_info;
- return &no_stepping_info;
+ return si;
}
static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
--
2.32.0
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
