On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:16:24PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
>
> We want to stop using guc.send_mutex while sending CTB messages
> so we have to start protecting access to CTB send descriptor.
>
> For completeness protect also CTB receive descriptor.
>
> Add spinlock to struct intel_guc_ct_buffer and start using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> index cf1fb09ef766..80976fe40fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct
> work_struct *w);
> */
> void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> {
> + spin_lock_init(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock);
> spin_lock_init(&ct->requests.lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.pending);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
> @@ -476,17 +478,22 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> GEM_BUG_ON(len & ~GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!response_buf && response_buf_size);
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> +
> fence = ct_get_next_fence(ct);
> request.fence = fence;
> request.status = 0;
> request.response_len = response_buf_size;
> request.response_buf = response_buf;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&ct->requests.lock);
> list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&ct->requests.lock);
>
> err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> +
> if (unlikely(err))
> goto unlink;
>
> @@ -822,6 +829,7 @@ static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> const u32 *msg)
> void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> {
> u32 msg[GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK + 1]; /* one extra dw for the header */
> + unsigned long flags;
> int err = 0;
>
> if (unlikely(!ct->enabled)) {
> @@ -830,7 +838,9 @@ void intel_guc_ct_event_handler(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> }
>
> do {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock, flags);
> err = ct_read(ct, msg);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.recv.lock, flags);
> if (err)
> break;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> index fc9486779e87..bc52dc479a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ struct intel_guc;
> * record (command transport buffer descriptor) and the actual buffer which
> * holds the commands.
> *
> + * @lock: protects access to the commands buffer and buffer descriptor
> * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
> * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
> * @size: size of the commands buffer
> */
> struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> + spinlock_t lock;
For struct members inline comments _much_ preferred, since then you can
make them multi-line and actually explain stuff - the header format
strictly speaking also allows multi-line, but not with nice formatting and
so encourages people to lean way too much towards brevity.
Plus it's closer where people look (for big structs).
I guess add that to the kerneldoc cleanup work.
-Daniel
> struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
> u32 *cmds;
> u32 size;
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
