This fixes the following build error with GCC 11:
In function ‘snb_wm_latency_quirk’,
inlined from ‘ilk_setup_wm_latency’ at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3109:3,
inlined from ‘intel_init_pm’ at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:7695:3:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3058:9: error: ‘intel_print_wm_latency’
reading 16 bytes from a region of size 10 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
3058 | intel_print_wm_latency(dev_priv, "Primary",
dev_priv->wm.pri_latency);
|
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘intel_init_pm’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3058:9: note: referencing argument 3 of
type ‘const u16 *’ {aka ‘const short unsigned int *’}
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2995:13: note: in a call to function
‘intel_print_wm_latency’
2995 | static void intel_print_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As far as I can tell, we don't actually need 8 elements except on SKL
and that uses dev_priv->wm.skl_latency which has enough.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 3f6d8b502a619..59498794ac4ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ int ilk_wm_max_level(const struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
static void intel_print_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const char *name,
- const u16 wm[8])
+ const u16 *wm)
{
int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
