On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
> Remove the remaining uses of INTEL_GEN_MASK() and the correspondent
> gen_mask in struct intel_device_info. This will allow the removal of
> gen_mask later since it's incompatible with the new per-IP versioning
> scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 8 +++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c | 8 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 661b50191f2b..ed5abe7be498 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -2008,12 +2008,14 @@ void intel_uncore_fini_mmio(struct intel_uncore 
> *uncore)
>  static const struct reg_whitelist {
>       i915_reg_t offset_ldw;
>       i915_reg_t offset_udw;
> -     u16 gen_mask;
> +     u8 min_graphics_ver;
> +     u8 max_graphics_ver;
>       u8 size;
>  } reg_read_whitelist[] = { {
>       .offset_ldw = RING_TIMESTAMP(RENDER_RING_BASE),
>       .offset_udw = RING_TIMESTAMP_UDW(RENDER_RING_BASE),
> -     .gen_mask = INTEL_GEN_MASK(4, 12),
> +     .min_graphics_ver = 4,
> +     .max_graphics_ver = 12,
>       .size = 8
>  } };
>  
> @@ -2038,7 +2040,7 @@ int i915_reg_read_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
>               GEM_BUG_ON(entry->size > 8);
>               GEM_BUG_ON(entry_offset & (entry->size - 1));
>  
> -             if (INTEL_INFO(i915)->gen_mask & entry->gen_mask &&
> +             if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, entry->min_graphics_ver, 
> entry->max_graphics_ver) &&
>                   entry_offset == (reg->offset & -entry->size))
>                       break;
>               entry++;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> index 0e4e6be0101d..f76c9bcec735 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -125,17 +125,19 @@ static int live_forcewake_ops(void *arg)
>  {
>       static const struct reg {
>               const char *name;
> +             u8 min_graphics_ver;
> +             u8 max_graphics_ver;
>               unsigned long platforms;
>               unsigned int offset;
>       } registers[] = {
>               {
>                       "RING_START",
> -                     INTEL_GEN_MASK(6, 7),
> +                     6, 7,
>                       0x38,
>               },
>               {
>                       "RING_MI_MODE",
> -                     INTEL_GEN_MASK(8, BITS_PER_LONG),
> +                     8, U8_MAX,

Makes me wonder if we should add VER_MAX. Can be done later if needed.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

>                       0x9c,
>               }
>       };
> @@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ static int live_forcewake_ops(void *arg)
>  
>       /* We have to pick carefully to get the exact behaviour we need */
>       for (r = registers; r->name; r++)
> -             if (r->platforms & INTEL_INFO(gt->i915)->gen_mask)
> +             if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915, r->min_graphics_ver, 
> r->max_graphics_ver))
>                       break;
>       if (!r->name) {
>               pr_debug("Forcewaked register not known for %s; skipping\n",

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to