Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Request watchdog infrastructure

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 26/03/2021 00:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:13:33PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

[snip]

+static enum hrtimer_restart __rq_watchdog_expired(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
+{
+       struct i915_request *rq =
+               container_of(hrtimer, struct i915_request, watchdog.timer);
+       struct intel_gt *gt = rq->engine->gt;
+
+       if (!i915_request_completed(rq)) {
+               if (llist_add(&rq->watchdog.link, &gt->watchdog.list))
+                       schedule_work(&gt->watchdog.work);
+       } else {
+               i915_request_put(rq);
+       }
+
+       return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+}
+
+static void __rq_arm_watchdog(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+       struct i915_request_watchdog *wdg = &rq->watchdog;
+       struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
+
+       if (!ce->watchdog.timeout_us)
+               return;
+
+       hrtimer_init(&wdg->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+       wdg->timer.function = __rq_watchdog_expired;
+       hrtimer_start_range_ns(&wdg->timer,
+                              ns_to_ktime(ce->watchdog.timeout_us *
+                                          NSEC_PER_USEC),
+                              NSEC_PER_MSEC,
+                              HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+       i915_request_get(rq);

Shouldn't we grab the new reference before we arm the timer? Either way
since fairly academic I went ahead and applied, but if you agree pls do a
follow up patch.

Absolutely true.. my bad.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx